Natalie Hopkinson observes how school choice has adversely affected the educational opportunities for her son and other children in her community in Washington, DC. Clearly school choice has winners and losers...and it comes down to economic and social justice. Again an education policy has gained political traction and funding that is failing to provide quality educational opportunities, equally, all our children.
Such inequities are the perverse result of a “reform” process intended to bring choice and accountability to the school system. Instead, it has destroyed community-based education for working-class families, even as it has funneled resources toward a few better-off, exclusive, institutions.
The idea was to introduce competition; good schools would survive; bad ones would disappear. It effectively created a second education system, which now enrolls nearly half the city’s public school students. The charters consistently perform worse than the traditional schools, yet they are rarely closed...Meanwhile, failing neighborhood schools, depleted of students, were shut down. Invariably, schools that served the poorest families got the ax — partly because those were the schools where students struggled the most, and partly because the parents of those students had the least power. [Full Opinion: The New York Times]